Two working-stage exterior scenarios: one meal to verify size requirements

Select 1,500 x 700 mm or 1800 x 800 mm cooling table, the difference being not only 300 mm wide but also 100 mm deep. It is possible to increase operational and lower-stage space in longer and deeper depths, as well as to compress access, increase back-handing and cleaning difficulties. Size decisions should be validated jointly with job assignments, table setting, bottom swings, door openings and footsteps and should not be applied directly by number or “better”.

The time line below is a demonstration section, not a real observation of a particular shop. The shop may be replaced by its own opening, peak, closing and replenishment points. The Electrolux Productional source discusses the choice of a cold device, does not directly support the sized conclusions of the ordinary cooling desk, and provides only a limited background in which the equipment selection should be combined with the task rather than a single parameter. [1]

The two external formulas use the same job starting point, the same menu, the container and the human condition in the sample, and draw both width and depth; the result is to answer only the point ' s capacity to carry the assumed boundary. Once accurate candidate information is available, it will also need to be re-checked with real appearances, doors and clean space, and the demonstration dimensions cannot be translated directly into procurement conclusions.

Show the time line first to expose four types of action

During the presentation, only high-frequency, programmed and clearly identified items were placed below the stage to record containers, layers, starting points and recharge points. Large packaging, inter-eat storage and refrigeration tasks are not filled with space available under the stage. The inventory should be organized first, otherwise the larger workstations would provide more unnamed space.

Prior to the demonstration peak, duct tape boards, tools, swing boxes and finished product intake areas were placed within the bounds of the tape on a real mission. The 1500 x 700 programme and the 1800 x 800 programme are re-routed from the same starting point for material, binding, temporary storage and handover. The additional 300 mm width and 100 mm depth are observed separately: whether the width reduces the surface conflict and whether the depth causes a change in the perforation, the back side of the corner or the channel.

At the peak of the demonstration, the purpose of each opening, the search, whether or not to take the whole, whether or not the container interferes with the closure, as well as the departure and error of personnel are recorded. Doors, refrigeration methods and maintenance functions can only be filled in from candidate accurate type information; the information remains unknown when not verified and the same series of configurations or functional names are not transcribed as field effects.

The presentation was conducted to clear non-fixed materials and to clean the floor, door seals, handles, laminates and accessible areas according to approved methods, before repositioning the necessary items. These problems cannot be offset by additional surfaces if the rear side of 1800 x 800 is not sufficient for a long period of time, or if the larger fuselage causes conflicts between carts, garbage recovery and repairs.

Three cards synthesized a table of observations.

One event line is used to align the table with three types of evidence:

Time/task	Table occupancy	Open the door and lower the stage.	Step/cross	Results and anomalies
Set	Necessary, transfrontier	Initial packagings, layers	Surplus entry route	Can you reset by figure?
Top Tasks	Temporary stacking, handling of conflicts	Search, move, close.	Out of work, wrong body, cart.	Waiting, stopping or not unusual
Package cleaning	Remove and Restore	The shelf, the door is sealed.	Cleaning and overhauling space	Dead ends, omissions, conditions of completion

Each event indicates menus, people, order loads and unusual background. Single or double persons are only a prior observation condition and are not an appropriate number of persons for a certain size. Single-person posts may also require more than one receiving area; a clear sequence of two-person posts may not require a longer stage.

The duct tape will first draw the outline of the body, open the door and clear it as necessary, then draw the available surface. Only 1,500 and 1800 front-lines will miss 700 and 800 in depth, door and back side cleaning. When not connected to real equipment, only space and movement can be verified and no temperature, capacity or performance can be demonstrated.

The observation window covers high and low peaks and is not mechanically locked for seven days.

It can start with a full menu cycle and at least cover peaks, low peaks, regular replenishments and slotting. Seven days may be appropriate for the weekly menu store, and there may not be enough for parties, rotation menus or seasonal doors. The window is extended according to the menu and the mission cycle, and indicates absence, promotion, temporary prefabricated or equipment anomalies.

The evaluation retained only those indicators that differentiated sizes: persistent inadequacy of active surfaces, whether cross-border items were necessary or not, replenishment and release, crossover of personnel, obstruction of doors, clean repositioning and corridor/repair effects. Temperature anomalies are disposed of and recorded in a door-to-door procedure, but cannot be directly compared with the two appearances at a time.

Inventory and set-up adjustments are performed before the same tasks are repeated. If the congestion disappears with unrelated material removal, it is not because of the size; if 1,500 x 700 are clearly set and repeatedly lacked the necessary bearings, while 1800 x 800 reduce conflict and have established access, access, cleaning and overhaul to support larger programmes.

In turn, if 1800 x 800 were to squeeze the wrong body or leave the back side uncleanable, even if the surface was wider, it would not pass through that point. If both options require frequent departures, the equipment points, the main reserve and the supply route are checked instead of choosing one of the two dimensions.

The comparison process needs to be replayed in another class.

The two borders cannot be crossed at will in the same cycle. The mission will be completed on 1,500 x 700, with cross-border items and cross-border movements recorded on a case-by-case basis; the same starting point will be restored and then replayed at 1800 x 800. Observers do not advise participants on how to use the additional space, otherwise it is the designer ' s guide rather than the job rule.

The surface items are divided into four categories: necessary, pending, unusual and unrelated. Continued cross-border support space-deficit assumptions for essential items; packaging and non-depositioning tools across borders only support sorting problems; and repeated backlogs of transients may come from downstream beats. The opening incidents were also divided into material extraction, resupply, reconciliation and error-finding, avoiding the use of a total number of evaluation equipment.

Footstep icons for departure purposes, holding status, door openings, carts and adjacent positions. Observations involving knife bearing, heavy load or risk intersections are assessed by competent professionals. A few steps less, but an increase in the holding of the wrong or blocking of evacuations and repairs cannot be judged to be better.

In addition to cleaning hours, the intake records where the items are temporarily moved, whether they are available on the back side and whether they can be repositioned by fixed position. The lack of a clean transition for the programme is illustrated by the fact that the wiping of the surface must be placed in a corridor or an incompatible area. It's done quickly, but it breaks the border.

The rerun of the tape boundary continues to contain prominent components, door openings, clean-up of personnel, cleaning tools, overhauls and public interfaces. Two versions of the drawings will be retained and differences will be resolved first if they are inconsistent with the site; the move of adjacent equipment to large equipment is a new option and the affected tasks will be rechecked.

The other stage is resumed with only the current job charts and rules, with at least one opening, one set of peaks, one replenishment and slotting cleaning. If this has to be explained on-site by the original designer, the programme is not yet available. The result of the rerun is different from that of the original class, with the first looking for a menu, a person, a container or a mission, without the average leveling.

Four types of results were found to be recorded: support for 1,500 programmes, support for 1800 programmes, lack of support for both and insufficient evidence. The benefits and costs of size are shown separately; access, food or human borders are stopped and cannot be offset by reduced footsteps or additional surfaces.

Parameters must be accurate in the model

This paper compares 1,500 x 700 mm with 1800 x 800 mm hypothetical boundary, not representing two confirmed models. Current information on the exact type of the candidate was obtained prior to the actual procurement; the series of pages showed that there were different lengths, depths, temperature zones and cooling modes of the workstation, and therefore the same shape could not be presumed. [2]

Before entering the procurement comparison, obtain current information on two exact models, each size, temperature zone, cooling method, door, internal shelf, access, heat dispersion, cleaning and maintenance. Any burden reduction' more even' or numeric effects would need to be matched with actual configuration and local certification.

It is also necessary to confirm whether the size of the name is in the form of an integrator, whether it contains prominent components such as handles, and the space required to open the door, heat spread and maintenance. The missing field on the web page remains unknown and is not added to another configuration in the same series. When the model is not in line with the evaluation model, the original specimen can only serve as a clue and recheck the interface.

The final conclusion is a conditional sentence: under the monitored menu, number of jobs, containers and meals, which options reduce the necessary conflicts and which corridors, cleaning, overhauling and food boundaries are met; which scenarios are not covered. The methodology can be reused across the store and model conclusions cannot be replicated without these conditions.

References

• Electrolux Production: A guide for the selection of cold equipment
• Zhidar: Commercial refrigeration series