The self-cooking machine chooses a small batch or a large pot.

Small, large and multi-pot descriptions of different production organizations do not allow for direct distribution by numerical size. First, the peak order is written into a time line, and then the candidate configuration is compared by indicating which vegetables are allowed to co-apply, when the pot must be made, when the material is ready, how long the change and cleaning take. The plant's single-screw weight can only provide a nuclear range and cannot be directly converted to a good hourly yield.

The menus are more varied and allow priority to be given to small and continuous production; demand is concentrated and formulations are stable, and larger numbers can be studied; and multiple stand-alone orders arrive at the same time and can be assessed for multi-pot parallels. However, these are the choice directions to be tested by the store and are not one-on-one recommendations for scene names and equipment models.

Let's find out which position we're waiting for.

Small groups reduce the number of commitments once, but may increase the number of batches and the frequency of food change; a large number of organizations concentrate on the same task, but need supplies to be delivered at the same time as boilers; and multi-pot organizations increase the number of parallel places without automatically increasing staff and distribution capacity. They may be used in the same store as they are optimized for different objects.

Before selecting the type, a distinction should be made between boiler queuing, late preparation, operator conflict and breakdown congestion. If the raw materials were to arrive only after the planned start, it would be difficult to resolve this delay by increasing the number of pot positions. If an employee had to take care of three key actions in the same minute, the multi-pot shape could not be transformed directly into three truly independent production lines.

Reasonable leisure is not a waste that must be eliminated. Some of the equipment leaves a window for temporary orders and some posts have to wait for the next approved conditions. Pushing the utilization rate to its highest level may coincide with the loss of the surplus of response orders and anomalies; better configuration should be based on satisfactory delivery, rather than only on whether the machine has been running.

Three public models only provide a starting point for comparison

For the G28DAA, the network lists the cookers 280 mm in diameter and the cooking weight 1.8 kg; for the G32DA, 320 mm and 2.5 kg, both pages are rated at 5000W and 220 volts. [1][2] These are labels for the corresponding page, which are not the continuous production measured in this paper and do not support the same weight for any food.

The G60EAS page is called Gas Smart 60 Catalina Cookers, 40 kg by weight field and 60 to 150 litres by capacity field, with a rated power of 2000 W and 220 V. [3] The page does not explain the system that is covered by the power or how the capacity range corresponds to the delivery configuration. It cannot be assumed on this basis that the total gas heat input is only 2,000 watts or that any configuration has a capacity cap.

The model here is intended to indicate what information is to be locked before comparison. G32DAA is not a close-named G32DG, and control methods, pots and accessories are not interchangeable. Formal procurement will also require specific configurations and information versions, and unspecified energy interfaces or installation conditions will be resolved by corresponding information and engineering confirmations and will not be completed through the adjacent model.

How did five orders get into the same line?

All the quantities and time shown in the table below are hypothetical and are used to demonstrate the discharge analysis and do not represent the performance of any model. At the latest, the task constraints in the example are not time limits for food safety.

Here we are.	Task	At the latest.	What do you have to judge first?
11:00	Twenty pickles.	1118 hours	Can we wait for the order later?
1104 hours	Eight bees.	1116 hours	Unlike A, do you need an independent period?
1108 hours	12 pickles	1124 hours	32 batches conform to process and lot
1110 hours	40 cedars.	1135 hours	Is it possible to assemble the sub-assembly when it is concentrated?
1114 hours	Ace 6	1127 hours	Whether or not the previous batch of beetles is allowed to merge

The sum of 32 copies of the Orchids does not mean that they should necessarily be approved together. Assuming that the candidate option is otherwise confirmed, that the corresponding set of tasks takes eight minutes and the raw materials are all ready, the first set of constraints can be met at 11:08 and 11:16. If it actually took 12 minutes, it would take 11.20 a.m. and the first was late.

This calculation only shows how time constraints change choices. Whether or not the thirty-two have landed in the permitted loading, whether the raw materials and formulations are consistent and whether the food results meet the requirements is separate. The number of copies cannot be changed directly to kg; each input, edible output and loss calibre should be consistent.

And you're going to have to put the last of the bellies back on the same timeline. The co-production plan for the acetone may work, but if it holds the only available pot slot, the acet could not be used at the same time. The fact that the two missions are eligible in each case does not mean that the grouping is feasible. A non-duplicable occupation area should be marked on the unified queue, and a decision should be made to change the order, unapproach or increase the number of jobs that would actually be able to work independently.

The same name may not be approved. Differing requirements may be required for flavouring, allergies, allergies, allusion requirements or delivery commitments. An increase in the loading rate should not lead to an indefinite waiting period for early orders; consolidation decisions should be able to indicate permissible conditions and starting points at the latest.

You can't get the line off the map.

It is assumed that 40 C-rays will be completed in a centralized manner, with 10 at the end of each assembly for three minutes per round, requiring four rounds for 12 minutes. If the first round can only start after all of them, the last 10 will be completed at least 12 minutes after the start of the sub-loading; the transfer and handover of containers have not yet been included. This hypothesis reveals the problem of succession in the latter part and does not provide for a 12-minute permit to wait for the finished product.

If the plan allows for the release of a batch or the introduction of multi-assembly jobs, the corresponding conditions and food control measures should be rewritten. The early completion of large quantities of equipment does not necessarily mean that the last mealer receives food earlier. The comparison should be made between the three points of time when the spring is released, when the assembly is completed and when the actual delivery is delivered.

The change and restoration also took over the window of the next task. The handling of pots, replacement of tools, application of cleaning and confirmation cannot be considered non-existent. The treatment of different surfaces and equipment may differ, and the steps of the cleaning guide for the frying furnace cannot be placed directly on the self-cooking machine, let alone to compress the necessary procedures for scheduling.

I want you to configure it with shadows without changing business.

Before the device is tested, the desktop can be discharged with a historical order or a confirmed menu. For each batch, write-off time, available boiler slots, allowed loading, expected start and end, refill and backend. The unknown period should be marked as a variable to be measured and the minutes cannot be guessed by the manufacturer ' s single weight.

Shadow discharges cover the type of order actually encountered, rather than choosing the menu that is the easiest to arrange for a day. Observe whether there are too many switchovers on the intensive arrival of small orders, what is the task of the equipment when a large number of demands are reduced, and whether multiple boilers are always waiting for the same reserve position. Failure arrangements help to exclude inappropriate configurations and should not be deleted from comparison.

It is possible to start with a few clear scenarios for the cycle and check whether the conclusions are sensitive. When a longer cycle results in a large number of late orders, the procurement judgement is highly dependent on real trials; if the cycles are stuck in parts, the next step should be to study the later part, rather than to continue the pursuit of a larger pot.

It is more appropriate to record both orders that are completed at the latest and average results. On average, a few minutes in advance does not compensate for the continuing failure of a service window for a key dish; conversely, it may not be appropriate to fill a very small number of super-sized tasks with all the equipment and may not be suitable for normal demand. The importance of the mission should be discussed in conjunction with the frequency of its occurrence, and a single point should not be used as a substitute for the selection of the site.

The final plan should spell out what each pot is responsible for.

The portfolio option allows for a stable large number of tasks to be separated from the temporary order, but does not simply add to the paper capacity. Provisions, posts, receivers, energy conditions and maintenance arrangements still need to be itemized. Each post should have a responsible range of tasks, with an indication of which orders would need to be rearranged at the point of suspension.

The formal testing of the candidate equipment should use the approved food process and the permitted configuration to record the satisfactory results and actual occupancy time. This results in mission capabilities under specific conditions, and the scope of application should be reassessed after changes in menus, loading or configuration. The selection of small batches, large quantities or large pots is ultimately based on whether the order can be stabilized in the complete process, rather than on the larger number on the specification table.

References

• Zhistoric Cabine Automatic Cooking Machine 28 cm G28DAA
• Fong Ji-da: Electromagnetic 32-barrel cooker G32DAA
• Zhida: Gas Smart 60-crunch cooker G60EAS